Friday 9 October 2009

Master Yin Shun (Ấn Thuận, 1906-2005)


Completing the Peace - Master Yin Shun (1906-2005)
by Bhikkhu Bodhi
*

"May I be able to revisit this human world of suffering and hardship life after life, and dedicate myself to extol the voice of perfect enlightenment for humanity!"
*
The Chinese expression used to describe the death of an eminent monk or nun, yuan ji, literally means "completion of the peace." On June 3rd, at 10:07 am in Taiwan, the Venerable Master Yin Shun "completed the peace," bringing to an end a lifetime that spanned almost a full century. The passing of Master Yin Shun is especially significant for us here at Bodhi Monastery, for he was the teacher of our own founder and guiding elder, Master Jen Chun. He had thus been in a sense the "spiritual patron" of our monastery and its affiliate, the Yin Shun Foundation. While we feel poignantly the loss of this great mentor, we also celebrate the end of a life nobly lived in the service of the Dharma and all humankind.

During the course of his long life, Master Yin Shun came to be recognized as the foremost Chinese scholar-monk of the modern age, with close to fifty volumes to his credit. He had also established a Buddhist seminary, FuYan Institute of Buddhist Studies, in Hsin Chu, and a lecture hall, HuiJi, in Taipei. Master Yin Shun was not only a scholar, however; he was also a visionary and a reformer. Unlike the academic scholar, his erudition was not motivated by a mere thirst for factual knowledge about Buddhism, but by a desire to understand the fundamental truth of the Dharma -- to understand Buddhism in its depths and as a whole. This urge for understanding was in turn driven by a conviction that the Buddha's teaching provided the key to rescue the world from suffering, that it offered a "message of world benevolence." When he first embraced the Dharma, however, he found the Chinese Buddhism that he encountered singularly unfit to meet this urgent challenge. He thus set out to use his understanding of Buddhist history and philosophy to transform the face of Chinese Buddhism and bring it into accord with the modern age. Though in his early years he faced stiff opposition from a conservative monastic establishment, especially after he migrated to Taiwan, for the past three decades he has been hailed as the most seminal thinker in the Chinese Buddhist world. In the eyes of many he would rank with the greatest Chinese masters of all time. A mark of the esteem he won was seen in the thousands of monastics and lay devotees who attended his funeral in Hsin Chu on June 11th. Even the president of Taiwan came to pay him farewell homage.

It is significant that Master Yin Shun did not come from a Buddhist family and thus did not receive the Dharma as part of his family heritage. He had to discover it at the end of a long and painful spiritual search that led him through Taoism, Confucianism, and even Christianity, and brought him to the edge of despair. Several years after he began to study Buddhism, both his parents died in close succession, and this left him free to fulfill his heart's desire to enter the homeless life of a monk. He received ordination in 1930, but his joy was soon overcast by shadows. When he saw how Buddhism was practiced in the China of his time, he was struck by the discrepancy between the Buddha Dharma he read about in the sacred texts and the stark actuality of Chinese Buddhism that he could observe around him: a religion mired in superstition, empty ritual, and blind devotion. This gap became the problem that obsessed him and that he sought to rectify in his writings.

To understand the degenerative tendencies in Chinese Buddhism, Master Yin Shun made a thorough study of the Chinese Tripitaka, going back to the Indian origins of Buddhism. Indian Buddhism thus became the focus of his scholarship. Early in his scholarly career he wrote a detailed history of Indian Buddhism and later produced several specialized studies of different topics in Indian Buddhist history. These include an insightful attempt to reconstruct the process by which the canonical collections of the early Buddhist schools were compiled; a volume on the development of the Abhidharma systems; and a 1300-page work on the origin and early history of Mahayana Buddhism. His writings also explored most of the Indian philosophical schools, with special emphasis on the Madhyamaka, which he considered the high point in the evolution of Buddhist thought. In The Way to Buddhahood, available in English translation (Wisdom Publications), the Master synthesized all the "vehicles" of Buddhism in accordance with a comprehensive scheme that unifies all the different Buddhist teachings into a single graded path.

Despite his vast achievements in the sphere of Buddhist scholarship, Master Yin Shun was not interested in knowledge for its own sake. His scholarship was driven, not by an urge for abstract knowledge, but by a determination to bring to light the potential of Buddhism as a world-redeeming, world-illuminating force. The transformed and purified form of Buddhism that Master Yin Shun advocated, which constituted his special platform, was what he called "Buddhism for the human realm." Whereas many Chinese regarded Buddhism as a protection against ghosts and demons or as a ticket to a heavenly rebirth, he saw the Buddha's teachings as a guide to the conduct of life in this world, the human realm in which we dwell. His approach to Buddhism thus sought to recover the human-centered side of Early Buddhism as well as of the early Mahayana. It also harmonized with the rich humanistic tradition of indigenous Chinese thought. However, for Master Yin Shun, the practice of Dharma was to be applied to life in this world not solely for mundane benefits -- and this is an important qualification -- but because this world provides the proper field for developing the qualities needed to achieve the ultimate, transcendent Buddhist goal: perfect Buddhahood. The "human vehicle" is not self-sufficient, but a means to enter the Buddha vehicle.

As a Mahayana Buddhist, Master Yin Shun gave precedence to the practice of the bodhisattva path, but he emphasized the continuity of this path with the practices advocated in the Early Buddhism of the Agamas and Nikayas. He thus helped to recover this ancient stratum of Buddhist thought and practice, long lost in Chinese Buddhism. He did not give much credence to such ideas as "rapid attainment of Buddhahood" or "becoming a Buddha in this very life," nor did he encourage the quest for rebirth in the Pure Land of Amitabha Buddha. He was particularly resistant to the deification of the buddhas and bodhisattvas and the "deity practices" of late Indian Mahayana, which he considered largely responsible for the decline of Buddhism in India. He stressed instead what he calls the "normal" bodhisattva path, which revolves around the generation of the bodhicitta, the cultivation of great compassion, the practice of the six paramitas, and the clarification of right view based on the wisdom of the middle way. His own great wish, which he often expressed in his writings, was to be reborn in the human world again and again and to follow the bodhisattva path as a human being.

Master Yin Shun did not try to build a personality cult around himself, nor did he allow others to turn him into an object of adoration. As a man he was simple, humble, and unassuming; he always stressed the central importance of the Dharma, not of himself. During his life he was a true example of the Buddhist teaching of selflessness, which he himself explained with depth and clarity in his writings. Though his passing deprives us of his physical presence, he will live on in his teachings, above all in his books. It remains a major project for Buddhist scholarship in the West to see that these are translated into English.

*

Thursday 1 October 2009

Conflicting views in meditation

Extract from www.dhammawheel.com

P. raised this issue:

I've read/heard so many different opposing views on meditation practice that I got confused!

For example:

* mental noting <-> silently observing

* jhana is necessary for awakening <-> dry vipassana

* The Buddha declared the four rupa-jhanas as samma samadhi and he didn't teach a sevenfold path <-> momentary and/or access concentration are sufficient

* not everyone can attain jhana / jhana is impossible nowadays <-> everyone can attain jhana, some even in a very short time

* Sayadaw U Pandita's distinction between vipassana jhanas and samatha jhanas <-> every other description of the jhanas

* the description of the jhanas in the suttas is different from the jhanas in the commentaries <-> the commentarial description of the jhanas is the same as in the suttas

* you have to practice samatha before doing vipassana <-> dry vipassana <-> samatha and vipassana aren't two separated systems

* don't practice samatha it just leads to a blissful feeling and to rebirth as a deva <-> samatha and vipassana aren't two separated systems

* if you want to practice vipassana you should watch the movement of the abdomen or chest as your primary object because the breath is a concept and therefore a samatha object <-> you can also observe the elements commonly labeled as 'breath' while they are touching your nostrils

* body sweeping is just a warm-up exercise <-> Goenka's approach

* The phrase "... putting aside greed & distress with reference to the world" in the opening of the Satipatthana sutta indicates that one has to attain a jhana and emerge from it first before doing satipatthana vipassana <-> the Satipatthana sutta is the defintion of dry vipassana

* The Satipatthana sutta is the crown of the Buddha's teachings <-> the Buddha never taught the Satipatthana sutta. It's rather a compilation of meditation instructions made by meditation teachers after the Buddha's parinibbana

* etc.

It's quite funny to see that many meditators think that their own technique is the best and everyone else got it wrong!

*
B. commented:

- I am not surprised that you are confused. I recommend that you find yourself a teacher that you have some confidence in and try one particular method to the exclusion of all others for a year (at least). I also recommend attending residential meditation retreats that will help you develop some depth of experience and to establish yourself with the practice.

This I think will be more beneficial than a smorgasbord approach.

J. commented:

- I think that you'll find a lot of these apparent disagreements are matters of symantics and language usage. If you look behind the words being said, and if you look to the actualy practice and results, you may see a lot of the seeming differences fall away. Not all of them, but many. It's like a person who says, "Wow, what a beautiful sunset," and another one says, "No, that's actually light reflected off particles in the atmosphere, not the sun." And then they discuss what a sunset actually is, and how to experience it correctly, and meanwhile the sun has long set and it's nighttime again. (So they can talk about the stars!)

Get a teacher, stick with a practice that works for you. Either you're doing it, or you're not. And in either one of those two cases, you have the opportunity to understand in equipoise in body and mind.

*

If I told you so ....

From: Jack Kornfield, 'Living Buddhist Masters'.

*

A Western monk once asked permission of his forest teacher to journey to Burma to try the intensive meditation systems of several other well-known teachers. Permission was readily granted. After several years he returned to his first teacher.

"What did you learn?" the teacher inquired.

"Nothing," answered the monk.

"Nothing?"

"Nothing that is not already around, that was not right here before I left."

"And what have you experienced?"

"Many teachers and many meditation systems," the monk answered. "Yet, the more deeply I penetrated the Dharma, the more I realized there was no need to go anywhere else to practice."

"Ah, yes," replied his teacher. "I could have told you that before you left, but you could not have understood."

*