Monday, 17 January 2011

Buddhism in the West (2): Ten Emerging Trends

Ten Emerging Trends in Western Dharma


Lama Surya Das
Source: http://www.orientalia.org/article586.html

*

For a number of years now, I have been observing religious trends and the transplantation of Asian Buddhism into the fertile fields of the Western world. From my particular vantage point, I observe what I call trends in Western Buddhism or American Dharma.

Speaking of the emerging Western Buddhism, there are many colorful, smaller threads woven into the larger tapestry. There seem to be groups variously emphasizing monastic Buddhism, lay Buddhism, ethnic Buddhism, meditation Buddhism, chanting Buddhism, ritualistic Buddhism and bare bones Buddhism; there is mystical Buddhism and practical Buddhism, academic Buddhism, therapeutic Buddhism, intellectual Buddhism, as well as anti-intellectual, no-mind Buddhism.

Some people are attracted to hermitage and retreat Buddhism, congregational Buddhism, socially engaged Buddhism, missionary Buddhism, health and healing oriented Buddhism, upper-middle path Buddhism, Jewish Buddhism, Christian Zen Buddhism, vegetarian Buddhism, pacifist Buddhism, tantric Crazy Wisdom Buddhism, to name a few.

The Vietnamese Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh said, "The forms of Buddhism must change so that the essence of Buddhism remains unchanged. This essence consists of living principles that cannot bear any specific formulation."

In The Awakening of the West: The Encounter of Buddhism and Western Culture, Stephen Batchelor writes, "Buddhism cannot be said to be any of the following: a system of ethics, philosophy, or psychology; a religion, a faith, or a mystical experience; a devotional practice, a discipline of meditation or a psychotherapy. Yet it can involve all these things."

Like him I know there is really no such thing as Buddhism; there are only Buddhists. When I speak of the ten trends on Western Buddhism, I therefore do so with certain reservations, not the least among them that I am primarily emphasizing meditation practice groups. Remember, these are emerging trends and there is still a way to go to fulfill this vision.

Trend #1. Meditation-based and Experientially Oriented

As Westerners, we typically come to Buddhism for meditation and contemplation in an attempt to improve our quality of life. We want to bring more mindfulness to what we do. We are usually attracted to Buddhism not through academia but because we want personal transformation, direct religious experience and compassion into our daily lives. The Dharma is not just something we believe in, but something we do.

Trend #2 Lay-Oriented

Although there is certainly room for traditional monasticism -- both short - and long-term -- Buddhism in the West is obviously much more lay-oriented than it has been historically. Practitioners are now bringing personal issues of relationships, family and work to the Dharma center in an effort to make more sense out of life.

Trend #3. Gender Equal

In an effort to go beyond traditional patriarchal structures and cultures, we have already make great strides in supporting women as well as men in teaching and leadership roles. There are more and more women teachers, and they are providing some of the finest teaching. Gender equality remains an ideal, but one that seems reachable. We all -- male and female -- have an opportunity to refine our more feminine aspects and practice a Buddhism in which we keep the heart and mind balanced, respectful of both body and soul. We are trying to learn from the past so as not to unwittingly repeat the mistakes of others.

Trend #4. Democratic and Egalitarian

Western Buddhism needs to evolve in a much less institutionalized, less hierarchical and more democratic fashion. Almost by definition, personal growth and the purest interests of the individual are going to be stressed more than institutional preservation and growth.

Trend #5. Essentialized, Simplified and Demystified

For the most part, noticeably absent from Western Buddhism are the complex, esoteric rites and arcane rituals designed for initiates only. Western teachers generally stress essence more than form, as well as teachings that are tolerant for daily life. It is thus practical and this world oriented, rather than otherworldly and hermetic, with great emphasis on integrating Dharma practice via mindfulness and compassion into daily life.

Trend #6. Nonsectarian

Most Westerners seem to have a true appreciation for many different meditation techniques and traditions. We have seen how politics, the quest for power, and sectarian bias have created chaos within various religious communities. We understand it is essential that we strive diligently not to fall into those same traps. As practitioners, we are generally interested in broadening and deepening our experience of the various different Buddhist spiritual practices. I think it is safe to say that there is a true appreciation of the benefits of nonsectariansim, ecumenicism and cross-fertilization. In fact, many teachers are already synthesizing the best of the various traditions. American karma is our great melting pot. We have to live with that and make the most of it.

Trend #7. Psychologically Astute

There is a growing appreciation for explaining Buddhist principles within the idiom of transformational psychology. Faith and devotion are important and useful for some, but the larger appeal is to the individual’s spiritual development and psychological and emotional well-being. Dharma students are encouraged to bring spirituality into their lives as opposed to using spirituality as a way of avoiding personal issues. We are working on ourselves and there are any number of interdisciplinary tools and methods. Psychotherapy and Buddhism are most often taken as complementary.

Trend #8. Exploratory

In line with our scientific and skeptical upbringing, questioning and inquiry are encouraged. We are striving to be dynamic and forward-looking. I see contemporary Dharma as basically a non-dogmatic Dharma, which is inquiring, skeptical, rational and devoted to testing and finding out for ourselves. Western Dharma is trying to stretch beyond dogma, insularity, isolationism and fundamentalist thinking.

Trend #9. Community Oriented

Through our shared spiritual, ethical, and educational interests, we are strengthened and building our spiritual community as well as our connections to each other. There is a great emphasis on the needs of the Sangha in the sense of the larger community instead of individual priests and leaders. One day, Ananda asked the Buddha, "Is it true that the Sangha, the community of spiritual friends, is half of the holy life?"

Buddha answered, "No, Ananda, the Sangha community is the whole of holy life."

Spiritual friends, spiritual friendships and simple friendliness -- this is the holy life. Here in the West where more and more people are expressing their personal needs for spiritual growth, it is the challenge of the Sangha today to provide spiritual encouragement for generations to come.

Trend #10. Socially and Ecologically Conscious

Gandhi once said, "Those who say the religion has nothing to do with politics do not understand religion." Increasingly as Buddhists we are attempting to extend our sense of social and moral responsibility to include others, particularly those who are suffering from various injustices and deprivations. We are also searching for ways to express our deep concern for the natural world. The contemporary lay Sangha is like an interdisciplinary "Lobby for Wisdom and Compassion."

*
The Dharma is very suited to a Western way of life. It need not be complicated, mysterious or fancy. Buddha Dharma is ordinary life including everything from meditation to relationship yoga and parenting practice. Among other things, it involves itself with the body-mind connection, which might well include suggestions like eating right, exercising right and having a sense of humor. One of my teachers, the late Dudjom Rinpoche, once said, "The Dharma is not fancy. It’s like blue jeans: good for every occasion, every day. It’s good for work. It’s good for school. You can wear blue jeans to a wedding, to ride horses, anytime."

* * *

Theo Pháp sư Surya Das, Đạo Phật ở phương Tây có 10 chiều hướng nổi bật như sau:


Chiều thướng 1: Hành thiền và thực chứng

Chiều hướng 2: Nghiêng về giới cư sĩ

Chiều hướng 3: Bình đẳng giới tính

Chiều hướng 4: Dân chủ và bình đẳng

Chiều hướng 5: Cốt lõi, đơn giản và không huyền bí

Chiều hướng 6: Phi tông phái

Chiều hướng 7: Sắc bén về tâm lý

Chiều hướng 8: Có tính thẩm trạch

Chiều hướng 9: Nghiêng về sinh hoạt cộng đồng

Chiều hướng 10: Quan tâm đến xã hội và môi trường

*

Buddhism in the West (1): Theravada


Theravada Buddhism in the West 
(Focusing on America and Canada)



Text of a talk given by Dr.Thynn Thynn 
in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Saturday, May 19th, 2007 on the occasion of the Buddha’s Birthday.



*

Blessings, the honorable Dr. Aung, Venerables and honored guests. I would like to thank Dr. Aung and the International Buddhist Friend Association for inviting me to give this talk. I am very humbled and honored.

I would like to begin this talk by recalling that in 1897, exactly 110 yrs ago, the first-ever Wesak celebration in San Francisco was presided over by Anagarika Dharmapala of Sri Lanka. This was perhaps the initiation of Theravada Buddhism in the New World. But it was not until the mid- 1960s that Theravada teachings were actually transplanted to America. During the 1950’s, both Zen Buddhism and Tibetan Buddhism were brought to America and made it their Western home. Before Theravada teachings arrived here, there was an extremely important development in the teachings in Southeast Asia, especially in Burma.

At about the same time that the World Parliament of Religions was taking place in Chicago in 1893, Ledi Sayadaw, the foremost scholar and meditation master, translated the Pali Canon into lay Burmese and thus planted the seeds of Vipassana meditation amongst monks and lay people alike. This was a watershed event in the annals of Burmese Buddhism, because for the very first time the Pali Canon became accessible to the lay community. Ledi Sayadaw delegated a layman – Saya Thet Kyi – the task of bringing Vipassana meditation to the lay Burmese community. Saya Thet Kyi, who was actually a farmer, became the first lay meditation master in Ledi Sayadaw’s tradition to popularize Vipassana meditation and began teaching organized retreats around the country. Many meditation centers were set up in Burma, and small groups of Westerners began coming to study with Saya Thet Kyi in the early part of the 20th century.

Prior to that, for 1500 years Vipassana meditation and the scriptures were confined to the monastics. Vipassana was practiced sporadically by monks, mostly on their own. With the coming of Ledi Sayadaw, a new era dawned for Burmese Buddhism. So in reality, the Vipassana movement amongst the larger lay community in Burma is actually just a little over a century old.

From Saya Thet Kyi grew a long line of lay Vipassana teachers beginning with U Ba Khin, a high government official. In the late 60s, Westerners began to visit and explore meditation with U Ba Khin, the first of whom were Robert Hoover and John Coleman, from England, and notably Ruth Dennison from America. That trio brought Vipassana meditation to England and America in the early part of the 1970s. In the meantime, Sayagyi Goenka, an ethnic Indian in Burma, studied with U Ba Khin and went to India and began teaching there; he also was a key teacher who spread the teachings and practice all over the world.

Another lineage was developing in the wake of Ledi Sayadaw, begun by Thaton Mingun Sayadaw. From him a long line of famous Burmese Meditation teachers evolved, the first of whom was the famous Mahasi Sayadaw. During the Burmese independence period in the 50s, Wai Bu Sayadaw and Mahasi Sayadaw were the most famous Meditation Masters and were instrumental in spreading the Vipassana practice amongst the lay population. In the Post-independent Period, Mahasi Sayadaw was invited by the Burmese Government to establish a meditation center in Yangon, and this created the ideal situation for Westerners to come to Burma to practice Vipassana meditation. In the same era many famous Burmese Masters such as Monhnyin Sayadaw, Sun Lun, and Mogok Sayadaw appeared on the Burmese Buddhist scene, making Vipassana in Burma a household word. In the 1960s, young American explorers of Asian spirituality also flocked to Budh Gaya in India and were exposed to Burmese Vipassana practice there as well. Joseph Goldstein, Jack Kornfield, Sharon Salzberg, and Jacqueline Schwarz-Mandell were initiated into the Vipassana meditation tradition by Munindraji, an Indian who was trained in Burma by Mahasi Sayadaw. These four American aspirants also went to Burma and studied with Mahasi Sayadaw himself as well as Sayadaw U Pandita. Jack also ordained in Acharn Cha’s tradition in Thailand. They returned to the West and in the mid-70s began to teach Vipassana in America.

Ledi Sayadaw’s lineage is carried in the West to this day by lay meditation teachers such as Daw Mya Thwin, Sayagyi Goenka, and Ruth Dennison, whereas Mahasi Sayadaw’s lineage branched out into two streams. A monastic stream to the West was carried by Burmese abbots such as Sayadaw U Pandita, Chan Myei Sayadaw, U Lekhana, Satamaranthi Sayadaw. This monastic track serves both Burmese and western meditators during their annual visits. The other Mahasi stream is carried by lay American Vipassana teachers such as Joseph Goldstein, Sharon Salsberg, and Jack Kornfield.

Meanwhile Sri Lanka had its own meditation Masters and was producing the best scholars, for example the late Sri Lankan monk Walpola Rahula, and Western scholars such as the late Nyanitiloka, Nyanaponika Thera from Germany and later Bhikkhu Bodhi who is of American origin. Their English translations of the Pali Texts were invaluable to Westerners studying and practicing Theravada Buddhism. Aya Khema, a German nun ordained in Sri Lanka, founded the Nun’s Island in Sri Lanka, which served as an important venue for Western women to practice meditation in Asia.

Thai Buddhism was also developing in the 1950s with the advent of Acharn Cha, a forest monk to whom a group of young Americans flocked to study with. Among the first from the West were Acharn Sumedho, Acharn Passano and Acharn Amaro. One notable Thai teacher was Acharn Nyeb a lay Thai woman.

Theravada Comes To the West

The first Theravada Sri Lankan and Thai monasteries were established by their respective immigrant communities around the 1960s in Washington DC, LA and NY. Later other Sri Lankan and Thai monasteries were founded in LA, Denver, and Chicago in the 70s. The same happened in Canada where Southeast Asian immigrants started setting up their own centers.

At the same time, the Mahasi stream of lay teachers Joseph, Jack, Sharon and Jacqueline established the Insight Meditation Society in late 70s in Massachusetts. IMS offered practices from all Theravada traditions: from Mahasi, U Ba Khin, and Acharn Cha.

A new development took place in 1979 -80 was the visits of the famed Burmese Masters Mahasi Sayadaw and Taungpulu Sayadaw to America. Mahasi Sayadaw was accompanied by the late Sayadaw U Silananda and U Kelatha. The latter monks stayed behind and founded monasteries in California and Maryland respectively. Later on additional viharas were started in NY, LA, Chicago, Texas and other towns in US. Taungpulu Sayadaw also set up a monastery in Santa Cruz in California with the help of an Indian-Burmese teacher Dr. Rina Sircar. She later became the Chair for Buddhist Studies at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, and was the very first Burmese-born woman to make any mark in America. Meanwhile, Laotians and Cambodians also established their own temples. The first higher ordination of an American, Scott DuPrez, took place in Wat Thai in 1979 in LA.

By the end of the millennium, there were more than forty temples in the US and Canada. Vipassana meditation began to be popularly known as Mindfulness or Insight Meditation amongst North Americans, and sitting groups in towns and cities were springing up all over the US and Canada. This was a new phenomenon, never seen in Asian Buddhist countries. Mindfulness or Vipassana sitting groups initiated by American Dhamma teachers totaled about 90 in 32 states by the year 2000. Spirit Rock Meditation Center was founded in Marin County north of San Francisco in the early 90’s by Jack Kornfield and others as a west-coast extension of the Insight Meditation Center in Massachusetts. In Shelburne Massachusetts a center was founded in the Goenka tradition. Bhavana Society was founded in late 80s by Bhante Gunaratana a Sri Lankan monk. Abhayagiri Monastery in the tradition of Acharn Chah was established in 1986 in Northern California with co-abbots Acharn Amaro, from the UK, and Acharn Passano, a Canadian from La Pas, Manitoba.

Having grown up secluded in a Buddhist country in the Orthodox Theravada tradition, when I moved to America in 1990 I felt like Alice in Wonderland. Suddenly there they are – the many Buddhist traditions and schools flourishing in the West – Zen , Tibetan Buddhism, Pure Land , Chan, Korean Zen, Vietnamese Zen, Theravadan temples, Vipassana centers, engaged Buddhism, the Buddhist women’s movement and so on. It was a great eye-opener to know that the various Northern Buddhism Schools and as well as Theravada Buddhism had been growing on the fertile ground of the North Americas for a century already.

From the time I migrated from Burma to Thailand in the early 80s to the time I established a Dhamma center in Northern California in 1998, it was like being fast forwarded from 19th century to 21st century Buddhism overnight. I witnessed the turn of the millennium of Buddhism in the West in Dec 2000 exactly 10 yrs after setting foot in US. As a newcomer to the American Buddhist scene, it took me quite a while to get the whole perspective.

Currently, about 180 ethnic Theravadan monasteries all over US are settled in their own enclaves and are serving the religious and cultural needs of their respective ethnic communities. There are 18 Sri Lankan, Thai, Khmer, Laotian and Burmese monasteries in Canada and Lay Buddhist organizations like the International Buddhist Friend Association. Amongst the ethnic monasteries, Sri Lankan monasteries drew the most Westerners compared to Burmese and Thai Temples due to the Sri Lankan monastic’s’ fluency in English. Unfortunately, the only abbot who was fluent in English amongst the Burmese Sayadaws was the late Sayadaw U Silananda but he was in great demand by the expatriate Burmese communities not just in America but all over the world. The only branch monastery he established was in Mexico.

The lay Vipassana movement began by Sayagyi Goenka and the pioneer Western teachers took off and exploded all over North America. According to Sharon Salzberg, it all started innocently by them simply teaching what they had experienced in their own practices in Asia, but it seemed to have a life of its own. Mindfulness has been taken up by not just the average American but by professionals, lawyers, Universities and colleges. Stanford University has an accredited course in mindfulness, UC San Francisco started a mindfulness club, and UCLA followed suit. Mindfulness has been incorporated into the popular stressreduction clinics begun by Jon Kabat-Zinn of the University of Massachusetts. Steven Smith from Hawaii took it into the business world as did Mirabai Bush of Mind and Life Institute. Psychotherapy is being integrated with mindfulness, as pioneered by Jack Kornfield, and now hordes of psychotherapists are integrating mindfulness into their own practices. But the interesting thing about this development is that many in the public who take up mindfulness meditation do not seem to know where this practice comes from, and most of them have not even heard the term Theravada Buddhism. Such is the paradox of the fast growth of Vipassana as a meditative trend.

IMS is more traditional and sticks to the traditional Theravadan model. They also have a Buddhist Studies Center to provide scriptural studies: its west-coast counterpart, Spirit Rock, is more eclectic in its approach and incorporates other traditions such as Tibetan retreats, Shamanic work, more of a smorgasbord or cafeteria approach. Dhamma Dena, a meditation center founded by Ruth Denison in Southern California, focuses mainly on the U Ba Khin tradition with innovative additions of movement and dance.

On the more orthodox front, Bhavana Society founded by Sri Lankan abbot Bhante Gunaratana provides a traditional form of practice and Buddhist milieu for Westerners and Asians alike. In the mid 90s Abhayagiri a Western monastery from the Archan Chaa tradition was established in Northern California and attracts Americans as well as Thais and Cambodians. Metta Monastery in San Diego is headed by Thanissaro Bikkhu a scholar and meditation teacher trained in the Thai forest tradition of Archan Lee Dhammadaro. These two monasteries maintain the strict Thai forest monastic tradition. The impact of these traditional monastic models on the American community is slow and gradual. The strict monastic codes of conduct and the patriarchal model of Theravada Buddhism in the West seem to be the stumbling block for Westerners, especially women.

Most of the traditions present in America seem to be represented in Canada – the Mahasi , Goenka, Achan Chah lineages, and teachers from IMS and Spirit Rock teach retreats here. The first ordination of a Canadian Bhikkhu by Canadian monks – Venerable S. Nanada abd Oavaro – took place at Birken forest monastry, and is a first for Canadian Theravada Buddhism.

One could say that Theravada Buddhism is the last wave of Buddhism to arrive in the New World and we are to a certain extent riding on the popularity of Buddhism began by Zen and the Beat generation, plus the success of Zen Masters like Suzuki Roshi, Maezumi Roshi and later Tibetan Buddhism brought by Chogyam Trungpa and other Tibetan Lamas. It is also important to note that the immense popularity of Dalai Lama in the West has a tremendous impact on the public in the New World, paving the way for new comers like Theravada Buddhism and Vipassana to follow.

Engaged Buddhism

Buddhism arriving on American soil also encountered political and social activism, and as such was absorbed into the field also. The Buddhist Peace Fellowship is one outcome, and members are from across the board of Buddhist traditions. Joanna Macy a famous activist is well respected in Western Buddhist circles for her work in Deep Ecology and the anti-nuclear movement.

Women In Buddhism in America

Although Western women teachers in the Zen and Tibetan traditions and the Vipassana movement have become prominent in America, very few Asian Theravadan women have achieved prominence other than Dr. Sircar. Another woman teacher from U Ba Khin’s tradition – Sayama Gyi Daw Mya Thwin – lived in England and came to teach in America off and on. From the Thai tradition there is Bikkhuni Dr. Prem, a psychotherapist who founded a temple in Massachusetts. I am a late arrival and my Dhamma center in Northern California was established in 1998. There are three retreat centers recently founded by Burmese women, Thanti Thitsa in LA was founded by Dr Khin Thi Oo a physician, a monastery was founded in Springfield Illinois by Dr Khinne Swe Myint, and a retreat center in Canada by a Burmese nun Daw Khemernandi. These centers invite Burmese abbots to teach retreats to Burmese and Westerners. Two Western Bhikkhuni, Ven. Sucinta and Ven Sudhamma, are abesses of the Sri Lankan temple Carolina Buddhist Vihara in South Carolina. This is the first of its kind – two Western Bhikkunis in charge of an ethnic Sri Lankan Vihara –because most Sri Lankan monks who were in residence there could not stay long because of loneliness and homesickness.

In my own experience of starting a Dhamma center in California and the experiences of other women, unfortunately I feel that female Asian Dhamma teachers are not taken seriously by the Burmese Buddhist community nor the Western Dhamma community. It may be so because we are a rare breed and a new phenomenon. In Burma there have only been nuns who founded nunneries teaching Vipassana and there has been little lay attention paid to Asian women teachers teaching in US. Hence my gratitude to Dr. Aung and the IBFA is boundless for inviting me as a Dhamma teacher and in recognition of my work in the US. It is a very rare honor indeed. My sense of the North American Dhamma scene is that – unless we female Dhamma teachers can successfully publish books – the work of female teachers will not be widely known or appreciated.

According to the well known Buddhist writer Sandy Boucher, when Buddhism arrived on the shores of America, feminism was already full blown and the patriarchal system of Theravadan monasticism did not sit well with Americans. Women in our era began to examine the status of women in Buddhism and finally started to find their own voice. Thereafter began an era of empowerment for Western women. In the early 80s, the first International Conference for Women called Sakyaditha (daughters of the Buddha) took place in Budh Gaya presided over by His Holiness Dalai Lama. Participating women from all Buddhist traditions from Asia and the West converged and founded their own forum and interconnectedness.

One of the stickiest points in Theravada Buddhism is the discontinued Bhikkhuni tradition in Theravadan countries. This issue is frequently addressed at the conference by such Buddhist women activists such as Prof Chartsuman Kabilsingh of Thailand, Karma Lekshe Tsomo a Tibetan nun, Aya Khema and others. Sakyaditha Conferences have been held every few years.

Against great resistance from Theravadan orthodoxy, some women persisted and got themselves ordained in Taiwan and South Korea. The struggle to set up the Bhidkkhuni Sangha was on, and the first male monastics to relent were the Sri Lankans. The Bhikkhuni Sangha was revived in Sri Lanka in 1998 with the ordination of 23 Bhiddkhunis in Danbulla. Currently over 200 Bhikkhunis have been ordained in Sri Lanka. A few Thai and Burmese bhikkhunis were ordained in Sri Lanka but the two Burmese bhikkhunis live in America where the spiritual climate is more conducive for them. In 2005 the first Bikkhuni Vihara was founded by Bhikkhunis Tathaaloka and Sucinta in Fremont, California. There is indeed a glass ceiling for all women in Buddhism, whether Western or Asian, ordained or laywomen, and it is a high ceiling to crack. My experience teaching and setting up a Dhamma center in America is no exception.

My attempt to establish a yogi center (semi-renunciate) from the Burmese tradition has had to contend with and overcome the great obstacle of gender issues. I chose this yogi tradition because it is neither hierarchical nor patriarchal and does not require ordination. It simply allows the person to commit and live a religious life and is not encumbered with rigid rules that do not work well in Western societies. So far I have found that it works very well and at my center the gender issue is a non-issue. Both men and women students are able to focus on their own practice and study without the distraction of gender struggles and biases.

I have been asked many times by Burmese friends why I don’t have a monk preside at my Center. This shows how foreign the tradition of lay women teachers is to the Burmese Buddhist community. It was an enigma for a lot of the Burmese Buddhist expatriates when I began to establish the center in America. For one thing, having a monk and a woman teaching in the same center is setting up for a split in the community. Most Burmese will support the Burmese monks, while Westerners on the other hand will relate better to a lay person. And most important of all I need the freedom and flexibility to chart my own course for the Center and carve out a path that will fulfill my aspirations to bring Theravada Buddhism to the West in addition to building lay Dhamma community of practitioners. Hence my center does not conform to any of the traditional Theravadan silent retreat centers nor simulate monasteries or nunneries in Burma or in the west.

Experience of setting up a Dhamma center in US

It is in this cultural environment that I had started my own center in Northern California nine years ago bringing Vipassana in Daily Life Meditation. When I was studying Buddhism in Burma, I thought the monastic tradition was too rigid and orthodox and tried to be more eclectic in my own journey. But when I arrived in America, I saw how Buddhism can become diluted and even distorted or admixed with different popular trends and practices, so I realized that I had to carve out my own traditional/non-traditional path when I began to teach in America. It was also part of my own evolution as a Dhamma teacher from Asia, to learn to steer the middle way between orthodoxy and excessive liberalism in creating my own Dhamma Center. It was in seeing the American Dhamma scene that I came to the realization of the importance and significance of the orthodox traditions. Without the strict monastic lineage of scholarship and practice in the Burmese tradition in Burma, Vipassana practice would not have had a chance to survive and even be brought to the West. But it is also true that the Theravada monasticism which served so well in Asia is not going to be suitable for the kind of Dhamma work I wanted to carry on in America. Hence my decision to find an alternative way of approaching the situation by establishing a Theravadan Center for householders in order to preserve and propagate the Dhamma.

I had to find a way to keep the identity of Theravada Buddhism, yet not stymie the atmosphere with an overkill of rigid Buddhist religious culture. How to bring the ancient teachings to bear in this day and age in the West within an alien culture and yet maintaining the original Buddhist thoughts without diluting them is an enormous challenge. But I regard it as a wonderful opportunity to use creative sensitivity to transcend the cultural differences of East and West, This has been the most exciting part for me, to meet these challenges, and to find the common ground of human expression that speaks to the heart and to the depth of our being. I came to realize that it is not just the meeting of the minds but of the hearts that close the cultural divide of East and West.

I wanted to experiment and let the center and the community grow organically at a comfortable pace, loose enough yet not too lax. Along the way I fashioned a way to the assimilate Buddhism and the North American psyche. I have come to understand and respect the spirit of independence of Americans and their willingness to explore and take risks. I felt it was important not to stymie these qualities, but instead to help Americans how to temper that spirit with wisdom and empathy. Americans also have a certain paranoia about authority, and in order to circumvent this in building community, the first thing I did was to form a horizontal organization rather than a top-down management style that Americans are wary of. Taking a leadership role yet also building consensus was what I found to be most successful with my American students. My goal is to show Americans that when authority is conferred with wisdom and metta, there can be a synergistic relationship of mutual respect and love on both sides, with the authority intact and the result I found is an empowered group of American Dhamma practitioners at our Sae Taw Win II Dhamma Center.

With these perspectives in mind I began teaching how to incorporate Vipassana and the Noble Eightfold Path in everyday life, with the fundamentals of Theravada Buddhism supporting the practice as opposed to the silent sitting retreat models taught in most Theravada centers. Later I began to introduce the essence of Abhidhamma to help my students understand the mental landscape of the untrained mind and how to transform one’s mental conditioning using mindfulness of mind states. The incorporation of the Noble Eightfold Path and Abhihamma teachings have been crucial to help American students bring Vipassana into their everyday life and ultimately become a way of life for them. I also developed a curriculum of graduated and continuing courses of theory and practice which runs about two years. This gives the students a well rounded education in classical Theravada teachings and this was crucial in deepening their own practice at the same time developing a healthy respect for classical Buddhism.

I also began to design a conflict resolution model and called it “Bringing Harmony to Conflict based on the Noble Eightfold Path.” My nine years of experience in community building in America have shown me that the most difficult stumbling block is the lack of integrating the Noble Eightfold Path in the student’s practice, where untrained mind and speech were the causal factors in bringing about disruption and disintegration of spiritual communities and families. I began to introduce Right Speech during the third year of setting up the center and by the fifth year I had developed the conflict resolution model. This has proved to be a pivotal step in the success of building a more stable growing community through the deepening quality of the students’ mindfulness practice.

Another facet was using modern educational science in creating the curriculum and using hands on training methods adapted from Montessori school and other alternative educational systems. This was also very much enhanced by using modern high tech means in presenting ancient teachings, which are very abstract, and also using technology to make the teachings and practice available for long distance students from America and elsewhere in the world who track our ongoing classes online.

I also surmised that for Theravada Buddhism to be established in the West there is a need to train lay Westerners to be teachers in Theravadan tradition. So far I have been training four of my senior American students as Teachers in Training who have become the central core of the small community. They are able to provide not only teachings but also be role models for our growing community of students. My goal in to developing classical Theravadan teachings and practical courses at our center using modern educational techniques and technology, is with the intention that these courses can be repeated and adopted by other centers if they so wish.

Teaching Modules

Over the last two years my assistant teachers and I have been designing and refining our courses. Currently we are trying to develop them into teaching modules that can be used by any other group who would like to use these modules at their own center.

Whither Theravada in the West

One question that comes up for me on Theravada Buddhism in the West is “where do we go from here? “ In the West we seem to have two ends of the spectrum in the Theravada tradition: the strict monastic tradition on the one end, and at the other end of the spectrum the loose and eclectic mindfulness movement which has more or less left traditional Theravada identify behind. Will the mindfulness movement in future generations become like Yoga in the West, just a stress reduction technique? Will Theravada Buddhism be confined to Asian ethnic groups and a few Western Monasteries? Are we not going to examine or find a way to make Theravada Buddhism and Vipassana meditation relevant to Westerners without losing our identity? With this question I would like to end my talk.

May all beings be peaceful! Sadhu sadhu sadhu!

*

Thiên tài từ đâu ra?

David Shenk
http://www.bbc.co.uk

*

Những tài năng thể thao hay nghệ thuật từ đâu ra? Khi mô tả họ "nhạc sĩ thiên tài", "vận động viên bẩm sinh" hay "thông minh thiên phú", chúng ta mặc nhiên cho rằng tài năng là do di truyền, có người có, người không có.

Nhưng nghiên cứu khoa học mới cho thấy nhiều điều thú vị về nguồn gốc của tài năng. Tất cả đều là quá trình phát triển, kể cả những gì có sẵn trong gen.

Các đây 100 năm, các nhà di truyền học tin rằng gen là người máy, sản xuất những mệnh lệnh giống hệt nhau như một cái máy, và phần lớn công chúng vẫn tin như vậy.

Nhưng trong những năm qua, kiến thức của các nhà khoa học đã được cập nhật rất nhiều.

Nay họ biết gen tương tác với môi trường chung quanh, khi ẩn khi hiện. Trên thực tế cùng một gen có các tác động khác nhau tùy vào nó tương tác với cái gì.

Dễ bảo

"Không có yếu tố gen nào có thể nghiên cứu độc lập tách rời khỏi môi trường," Giáo sư Michael Meaney từ McGill University ở Canada nói.

''Và cũng không có yếu tố môi trường nào hoạt động độc lập với gen. [Dấu vết] chỉ xuất hiện từ sự tương tác giữa gen và môi trường."

Điều đó có nghĩa tất cả những gì về chúng ta - cá tính, trí thông minh, khả năng - thực ra do cuộc đời của một người quyết định. Khái niệm ''bẩm sinh'' không còn đúng nữa.

"Một con thú bắt đầu cuộc đời của nó với khả năng phát triển nhiều cách khác nhau," nhà sinh vật học Patrick Bateson từ Cambridge University nói.

"Con thú có tiềm năng theo các con đường phát triển khác nhau. Con đường nó chọn tùy thuộc vào môi trường con thú đó lớn lên."

Nói vậy gen không có vai trò gì à? Dĩ nhiên không phải vậy. Chúng ta đều khác nhau và có những tiềm năng khác nhau. Sẽ không bao giờ có chuyện tôi là cầu thủ bóng đá Cristiano Ronaldo. Chỉ có Cristiano Ronaldo hồi bé có cơ hội thành Cristiano Ronaldo bây giờ.

Nhưng ta cũng nên biết Cristiano Ronaldo có thể đã rất khác so với ngày nay, với những khả năng khác. Nói cách khác, tài năng lừa bóng của Cristiano Ronaldo không phải xuất phát từ gen.

Khả năng thích nghi

Tài xế taxi London nổi tiếng nhớ đường của một trong những thành phố phức tạp nhất trên thế giới này. Năm 1999, bác sĩ thần kinh Eleanor Maguire chụp hình não của họ và so sánh với những người khác.

Não của các tài xế lâu năm có vùng hippocampus lớn hơn bình thường - đó là phần trên não giúp nhớ địa danh. Bác sĩ cũng thấy cỡ của phần này lớn nhỏ tùy theo năm nghề của người tài xế. Điều đó có nghĩa vận động trí nhớ trong khi lái taxi đã làm thay đổi não của người tài xế.

Kết quả nghiên cứu này cũng đúng trong trường hợp của các nghệ sĩ violin, người đọc chữ Braille, người tập thiền, và bệnh nhân đang hồi phục sau khi bị tai biến mạch máu não.

Não sẽ thích nghi với yêu cầu của chúng ta đưa ra.

Số phận

Khái niệm mới này thực khó nuốt khi mà người ta đã cố gắng thuyết phục chúng ta rằng mỗi một người trong chúng ta kế thừa một lượng thông minh nhất định, và đa số chúng ta sẽ là những con người tầm thường.

Chúng ta được làm quen với chỉ số thông minh IQ từ gần một thế kỷ qua. Vậy mà người nghĩ ra cách đo lường này, Alfred Binet, có ý kiến ngược hẳn, và khoa học cuối cùng về phe Binet.

"Trí thông minh đại diện cho một số khả năng trong quá trình phát triển," Robert Sternberg từ Tufts University, USA, phát biểu năm 2005, sau nhiều chục năm nghiên cứu.

Các chuyên gia nghiên cứu trong lĩnh vực này, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Kevin Rathunde và Samuel Whalen đồng ý.

"Những người học giỏi không nhất thiết sinh ra thông minh hơn người khác," họ viết trong quyển sách Talented Teenagers (Những thiếu niên có tài), "mà do siêng năng và có kỷ luật hơn."

James Flynn từ University of Otago, New Zealand, đã thống kê được chỉ số IQ tự chúng đã tăng dần trong thế kỷ qua, vốn sau khi nghiên cứu cẩn thận, ông nói là nhờ có văn hóa tinh vi hơn. Nói cách khác, chúng ta thông minh hơn là nhờ sự nhào nặn của văn hóa chúng ta.

Sâu sắc hơn, Carol Dweck từ Stanford University, USA, đã chứng minh được rằng sinh viên nào hiểu rằng trí thông minh có thể đào tạo, thường có nhiều tham vọng và thành công hơn.

Điều đó cũng áp dụng cho tài năng khi ta thấy những người đứng đầu trong các bộ môn, ngày nay có nhiều kỹ năng hơn so với các thế hệ trước.

Tất cả những khả năng tùy thuộc vào tiến trình phát triển tiệm tiến mà các nền văn hóa nhỏ đã tìm ra cách để cải tiến.

Nhào nặn

Trong những năm qua một lĩnh vực hoàn toàn mới gọi là "chuyên môn học", do nhà tâm lý học Anders Ericsson từ Florida State University dẫn đầu, đã tìm cách xác định nguồn và phương pháp của những sự cải tiến nho nhỏ đó.

Từng bước nhỏ họ ngày càng hiểu hơn làm thế nào thái độ, cách dạy, và cách thực hành khác nhau có thể giúp đưa con người vào các lộ trình khác nhau.

Con cái của bạn có tiềm năng trở thành vận động viên đẳng cấp quốc tế, nghệ sĩ tài ba, hay một nhà khoa học đoạt giải Nobel?

Sẽ là điên rồ nếu cho rằng ai cũng có thể làm hay trở thành bất kỳ cái gì. Nhưng ngành khoa học mới cho thấy cũng điên rồ nếu nghĩ rằng sự tầm thường là hiển nhiên trong đa số chúng ta, hoặc bất kỳ ai trong chúng ta cũng có thể biết những giới hạn của mình trước khi bỏ ra vô số tài lực và thời gian.

Khả năng của chúng ta không được đúc sẵn trong gen. Chúng có thể nhào nặn được, và có thể làm khi đã là người lớn. Với sự khiêm tốn, niềm hy vọng, và sự quyết tâm phi thường, bất kỳ đứa trẻ nào, ở bất kỳ lứa tuổi nào, đều có thể khao khát đạt được những điều to lớn.

* - *

Is there a genius in all of us?

David Shenk 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/

*
Where do athletic and artistic abilities come from? With phrases like "gifted musician", "natural athlete" and "innate intelligence", we have long assumed that talent is a genetic thing some of us have and others don't.

But new science suggests the source of abilities is much more interesting and improvisational. It turns out that everything we are is a developmental process and this includes what we get from our genes.

A century ago, geneticists saw genes as robot actors, always uttering the same lines in exactly the same way, and much of the public is still stuck with this old idea. In recent years, though, scientists have seen a dramatic upgrade in their understanding of heredity.

They now know that genes interact with their surroundings, getting turned on and off all the time. In effect, the same genes have different effects depending on who they are talking to.

Malleable

"There are no genetic factors that can be studied independently of the environment," says Michael Meaney, a professor at McGill University in Canada.

It would be folly to suggest that anyone can literally do or become anything. But the new science tells us that it's equally foolish to think that mediocrity is built into most of us”

"And there are no environmental factors that function independently of the genome. [A trait] emerges only from the interaction of gene and environment."

This means that everything about us - our personalities, our intelligence, our abilities - are actually determined by the lives we lead. The very notion of "innate" no longer holds together.

"In each case the individual animal starts its life with the capacity to develop in a number of distinctly different ways," says Patrick Bateson, a biologist at Cambridge University.

"Like a jukebox, the individual has the potential to play a number of different developmental tunes. The particular developmental tune it does play is selected by [the environment] in which the individual is growing up."

Is it that genes don't matter? Of course not. We're all different and have different theoretical potentials from one another. There was never any chance of me being Cristiano Ronaldo. Only tiny Cristiano Ronaldo had a chance of being the Cristiano Ronaldo we know now.

But we also have to understand that he could have turned out to be quite a different person, with different abilities. His future football magnificence was not carved in genetic stone.

Doomed

This new developmental paradigm is a big idea to swallow, considering how much effort has gone into persuading us that each of us inherits a fixed amount of intelligence, and that most of us are doomed to be mediocre.

The notion of a fixed IQ has been with us for almost a century. Yet the original inventor of the IQ test, Alfred Binet, had quite the opposite opinion, and the science turns out to favour Binet.

"Intelligence represents a set of competencies in development," said Robert Sternberg from Tufts University in the US in 2005, after many decades of study.

Talent researchers Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Kevin Rathunde and Samuel Whalen agree.

"High academic achievers are not necessarily born 'smarter' than others," they write in their book Talented Teenagers, "but work harder and develop more self-discipline."

James Flynn of the University of Otago in New Zealand has documented how IQ scores themselves have steadily risen over the century - which, after careful analysis, he ascribes to increased cultural sophistication. In other words, we've all gotten smarter as our culture has sharpened us.

Most profoundly, Carol Dweck from Stanford University in the US, has demonstrated that students who understand intelligence is malleable rather than fixed are much more intellectually ambitious and successful.

The same dynamic applies to talent. This explains why today's top runners, swimmers, cyclists, chess players, violinists and on and on, are so much more skilful than in previous generations.

All of these abilities are dependent on a slow, incremental process which various micro-cultures have figured out how to improve. Until recently, the nature of this improvement was merely intuitive and all but invisible to scientists and other observers.

How a London cabbie's brain grows

London cabbies famously navigate one of the most complex cities in the world. In 1999, neurologist Eleanor Maguire conducted MRI scans on their brains and compared them with the brain scans of others. In contrast with non-cabbies, experienced taxi drivers had a greatly enlarged posterior hippocampus - that part of the brain that specialises in recalling spatial representations.

What's more, the size of cabbies' hippocampi correlated directly with each driver's experience: the longer the driving career, the larger the posterior hippocampus.

That showed that spatial tasks were actively changing cabbies' brains. This was perfectly consistent with studies of violinists, Braille readers, meditation practitioners, and recovering stroke victims.

Our brains adapt in response to the demands we put on them.

Soft and sculptable

But in recent years, a whole new field of "expertise studies", led by Florida State University psychologist Anders Ericsson, has emerged which is cleverly documenting the sources and methods of such tiny, incremental improvements.

Bit by bit, they're gathering a better and better understanding of how different attitudes, teaching styles and precise types of practice and exercise push people along very different pathways.

Does your child have the potential to develop into a world-class athlete, a virtuoso musician, or a brilliant Nobel-winning scientist?

It would be folly to suggest that anyone can literally do or become anything. But the new science tells us that it's equally foolish to think that mediocrity is built into most of us, or that any of us can know our true limits before we've applied enormous resources and invested vast amounts of time.

Our abilities are not set in genetic stone. They are soft and sculptable, far into adulthood. With humility, with hope, and with extraordinary determination, greatness is something to which any kid - of any age - can aspire.

*

Friday, 14 January 2011

Luận sư Di-lặc

Nhân nói về mùa Xuân Di-lặc và vị Phật tương lai, Ngài Bồ-tát Di-lặc, có lẽ cũng cần tìm hiểu thêm về một vị Di-lặc khác: Luận sư Di-lặc, thầy của Luận sư Vô Trước.
*

Theo Wikipedia, một số các nhà Phật học như các vị giáo sư Erich Frauwallner, Giuseppe Tucci, và Hakiju Ui cho rằng Luận sư Di-lặc (Maitreya-nātha – khoảng 270-350 TL) là tên một nhân vật lịch sử trong 3 vị luận sư khai sáng Du-già hành tông (Yogācāra) hay Duy thức tông (Vijñānavāda): Di-lặc (Maitreya-nātha), Vô Trước (Asaṅga), Thế Thân (Vasubandhu). Tuy nhiên, theo truyền thống, nhiều người tin rằng đây chính là Bồ-tát Di-lặc (Bodhisattva Maitreya) – vị Phật tương lai, và hiện đang ngự tại cung trời Đâu-suất (Tusita).

Sự khác biệt này bắt nguồn từ nhiều lý do, trong đó:

(a) trong thời kỳ Đại thừa bắt đầu phát triển tại Ấn Độ, người ta vì tôn kính các luận sư cao tăng nên có khuynh hướng tôn xưng quý ngài là các vị Bồ-tát; từ đó, có thể đã có sự nhầm lẫn giữa ngài luận sư Di-lặc là thầy của ngài Vô Trước và ngài Bồ-tát Di-lặc, vị Phật tương lai;

(b) một số các bài luận thường giải thích là do quý ngài ấy hiểu được qua trạng thái nhập định (samadhi) và tham cứu với các vị Bồ-tát ở các cung trời, nhất là với ngài Bồ-tát Di-lặc tại cung Đâu-suất.

Ngài Di-lặc, theo Wikipedia, được xem là tác giả, hoặc đồng tác giả với ngài Vô Trước, của các luận phẩm:

1) Yogācāra-bhūmi-śāstra (Du-già sư địa luận, T1579)
2) Mahāyāna-sūtrālamkāra-kārikā (Đại thừa kinh trang nghiêm luận, T1604)
3) Madhyānta-vibhāga-kārikā (Trung biên phân biệt luận hay Biện trung biên luận, T1599, 1600, 1601)
4) Ratna-gotra-vibhaga, còn có tên là Uttara-ekayāna-ratnagotra-śāstra (Cứu cánh nhất thừa bảo tánh luận, T1611)

5) Dharma-dharmatā-vibhāga (Pháp pháp tính phân biệt luận)
6) Abhisamaya-alamkāra (Hiện quán trang nghiêm luận )

Hai quyển Abhisamaya-alamkāra và Dharma-dharmatā-vibhāga chỉ tìm thấy trong kinh thư Tây Tạng, và Abhisamaya-alamkāra được dịch sang tiếng Hán trong thập niên 1930. Có quan niệm cho rằng dường như 2 quyển này được trước tác về sau, không phải trong thời kỳ của ngài Vô Trước.

Theo bản mục lục của Đại chính Tân tu Đại tạng kinh, ngài Di-lặc là tác giả của:

(trong Bộ Luật)
T1499: Bồ Tát Giới Yết Ma Văn, 1 quyển, [Di Lặc Bồ Tát thuyết, Đường Huyền Trang dịch]
T1501: Bồ Tát Giới Bổn, 1 quyển, [Di Lặc Bồ Tát thuyết, Đường Huyền Trang dịch]

(trong Bộ Du-già)
T1579: Du Già Sư Địa Luận, 100 quyển, [Di Lặc Bồ Tát thuyết, Đường Huyền Trang dịch]
T1601: Biện Trung Biên Luận Tụng, 1 quyển, [Di Lặc Bồ Tát thuyết, Đường Huyền Trang dịch]
T1615: Vương Pháp Chánh Lý Luận, 1 quyển, [Di Lặc Bồ Tát thuyết, Đường Huyền Trang dịch]

*

Thursday, 13 January 2011

Mùa Xuân Di Lặc

Nguồn: Bồ Đề Đạo Tràng, www.bodedaotrang.com
*

Ý nghĩa cúng rước vía đức Phật Di Lặc đầu năm
 Thích Phước Thái

*

Hỏi: Kính thưa Thầy, con không hiểu lý do tại sao đêm giao thừa ở các chùa cũng như ở tư gia của nhiều gia đình Phật tử lại thiết lễ cúng rước vía đức Phật Di Lặc. Vậy ý nghĩa rước vía đó như thế nào? Kính xin Thầy hoan hỷ giải đáp cho con rõ. Con kính cám ơn Thầy.

Ðáp: Việc thiết cúng rước vía đức Phật Di Lặc, đây là một truyền thống đã có lâu đời. Nhưng dựa vào đâu mà người ta lấy ngày mùng một Tết hằng năm để làm ngày kỷ niệm rước vía Ngài? Vấn đề nầy, theo sự khảo cứu của chúng tôi, thì chúng tôi chưa thấy có chỗ nào nói rõ việc nầy. Chỉ thấy trong quyển “Xuân Trong Cửa Thiền” của Hòa Thượng Thích Thanh Từ, xuất bản năm 1997, Hòa Thượng có nêu ra và giải thích vấn đề nầy. Sở dĩ người ta chọn ngày đầu năm, tức ngày mùng một Tết âm lịch, các chùa theo hệ phái Phật giáo Phát Triển cũng như đa số Phật tử làm lễ rước vía Ngài, theo Hòa Thượng Thanh Từ cho rằng, đây là do chư Tổ Trung Hoa bày ra. Chớ không thấy sách sử nào ghi rõ về ngày sanh của Ngài cả.

Bồ tát Di Lặc theo sử ghi, thì Ngài là một nhân vật lịch sử có thật ở Ấn Ðộ thời Phật. Di Lặc là tiếng Phạn, Trung Hoa dịch là Từ Thị. Thị nghĩa là họ của Ngài, còn Từ là chỉ cho từ bi. Về tên họ của Ngài có nhiều thuyết nói không giống nhau. Ngài cũng có tên là A Dật Ða (tiếng Phạn ) Trung Hoa dịch là Vô Nan Thắng. Theo thói quen, chúng ta thường gọi Ngài là Phật Di Lặc, kỳ thật, thì Ngài chỉ là một vị Bồ tát nhất sanh bổ xứ, hiện ở nội viện thiên cung của cõi trời Ðâu Suất. Theo lời huyền ký của đức Phật Thích Ca, thì sau nầy, Ngài sẽ hạ sanh xuống cõi Ta bà tu hành thành Phật dưới cội cây Long Hoa. Bấy giờ, người ta mới tôn xưng Ngài là Phật Di Lặc.

Ngày nay, trong các chùa thuộc hệ phái Phật giáo Bắc Tông đều tôn thờ hình tượng Ngài, với tư thế Ngài ngồi phạch ngực, mập mạp, bụng to và miệng cười toe toét. Có hình tượng trên thân hình Ngài còn có 6 đứa con nít bu chung quanh, đứa thì móc lỗ tai, móc mắt, móc miệng v.v… Ai trông thấy cũng tưởng như là một trò đùa, nhưng đó là tượng trưng một ý nghĩa rất thâm sâu. Ý nói rằng, dù cho 6 giặc ( 6 trần: sắc, thinh, hương, vị, xúc pháp ) có quậy phá đến đâu, cũng không làm cho tâm Ngài phải bị dao động, Vì sáu căn ( mắt, tai, mũi, lưỡi, thân, ý ) của Ngài đã hoàn toàn thanh tịnh. Hình tượng nầy, người ta y cứ vào hóa thân của Ngài là một vị Bố Ðại Hòa Thượng ( HT mang túi vải lớn ) ở vào thời Ngũ Ðại khoảng thế kỷ thứ 10 bên Trung Hoa, mà người ta tạo tạc, đắp tượng tôn thờ. Thế nhưng, tại sao biết đó là hóa thân của Bồ tát Di Lặc? Vì trước khi viên tịch, Ngài có để lại bài kệ:

Di Lặc chơn Di Lặc
Phân thân thiên bách ức
Thời thời thị thời nhơn
Thời nhơn tự bất thức

Nghĩa là:

Di Lặc thật Di Lặc
Phân thân trong muôn ức
Thường thường chỉ dạy người đời
Người đời tự không biết.


Chính nhờ bài kệ nầy mà người ta mới biết Bố Ðại Hòa Thượng là hóa thân của đức Di Lặc.

Trở lại câu hỏi trên, tại sao phải lấy ngày mùng một Tết làm ngày vía? Thường người ta hay lấy ngày sanh hoặc ngày tịch để làm ngày kỷ niệm gọi là ngày vía. Nhưng ở đây thì không nằm trong thông lệ đó. Mà đây là ý nghĩa thâm sâu trong nhà Thiền, do chư Tổ khéo bày chọn ngày nầy làm ngày vía của Ngài. Theo tục lệ của người Á Ðông nói chung, người Việt Nam nói riêng, phần đông người ta rất chú trọng đến việc kiêng cử ngày đầu năm. Vì ngày đầu năm, người ta cho rằng đó là ngày quyết định cho việc tốt xấu, hên xuôi, trọn một năm. Do đó, nên người Phật tử cúng rước vía Bồ Tát Di Lặc với thâm ý là để được trọn năm an vui hạnh phúc. Vì Bồ tát Di Lặc chuyên tu hạnh hỷ xả. Do đó, nên người ta tạc tạo tượng Ngài lúc nào cũng thấy Ngài ngồi an nhiên vui cười hỷ hạ.

Ðức Di Lặc ngồi trơ bụng đá
Bao bụi trần bám đã rồi rơi
Mặc cho thế sự đầy vơi
Dững dưng như một nụ cười an nhiên.


Niềm ước vọng cuối cùng của người tu là mong cầu thành Phật. Gần hơn là người ta mong được an vui hạnh phúc. Muốn thế, tất nhiên người Phật tử cần phải noi theo tấm gương hỷ xả của ngài. Từ, bi, hỷ xả, đó là tứ vô lượng tâm tức bốn tâm hành không lường của một vị Bồ tát. Mà Bồ tát Di Lặc là biểu trưng đầy đủ cụ thể cho bốn tâm hành nầy. Lúc nào trên gương mặt của Ngài cũng hỷ xả an vui hạnh phúc.

Có xả bỏ những ưu phiền nội kết trong tâm, thì con người mới thật sự có an vui hạnh phúc. Ðó mới thật là thứ hạnh phúc chơn thật. Cho nên, khi tưởng niệm lễ bái Ngài đầu năm, người Phật tử ước vọng tương lai đời mình sẽ được thành Phật như Ngài. Ðồng thời, cũng quyết tâm thật hành theo hạnh hỷ xả của Ngài. Có thế, thì trọn năm người Phật tử mới được nhiều lợi lạc vui tươi hạnh phúc. Bằng ngược lại, thì sẽ chuốc lấy nhiều đau khổ. Ðó là ý nghĩa và cũng là lý do chính yếu mà người Phật tử tưởng niệm lễ vía Ngài đầu năm vậy.

Kính chúc Phật tử trọn hưởng một mùa xuân Di Lặc và luôn luôn an vui hạnh phúc bằng một nụ cười hỷ xả trên môi.

*

Net Scam

Source: http://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/ConsumerProtection/scamnet/content/pages/FightBack/email_scams.html 

*
Email scams

*

The Internet and email has led to a rise in unsolicited and unwanted spam and scams.
 
- Do not open email from unknown people. Delete them from your in-box.


- Do not click on links contained in unsolicited emails, including unsubscribe links. It might be directing you to a site where malicious software can be downloaded into your computer.

- Familiarise yourself with the tricks scammers use to get you to click on links including bank phishing, confirmation and e-greeting emails.

- Just because an email is personally addressed to you, it doesn't mean it's legitimate. There are a number of ways that clever scammers can make the email appear as if it is personally addressed to you. For example, they can install a program in the email they send out to capture your Display Name and embed it in a template email;

- Be aware that scammers can hijack other people’s address boxes to send spam or scams so the email could appear to come from someone you know. If someone sends you a link like this ask them why? We would suggest you send a fresh email to them rather than reply to the suspect email you have received.

- Make sure your computer has the latest anti-virus and firewall protections.

- Safeguard your email address by only providing your email contact details to people or organisations that you know and trust.

- If you have fallen for a phishing scam and provided your online bank details, change your password and contact your financial institution. Similarly, if you have provided your password for an online auction, secure payment or job site, change your password and contact the site for further advice. The scammers may be after your personal information for identity fraud.

- If your home computer is infected with a virus, you should use commercially available anti-virus software to quarantine and remove the virus. If the virus was sent to you via an infected email from someone you know, then you should advise them their computer is probably also infected.

- If you cannot solve the problem yourself, you may need to engage the services of your local computer shop or IT professional for assistance.

(For netters living in Western Australia)

- Spam, or electronic junk email, is a Federal offence. If you have been a target of spam please contact the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) at http://www.spam.acma.gov.au/  .

Forward suspicious scam emails to WA ScamNet ( wascamnet@commerce.wa.gov.au ).

*

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

Vì sao gọi là Chùa?

Vì sao gọi là Chùa? Ý nghĩa các tên gọi của ngôi chùa dưới góc độ ngôn ngữ văn hóa

Tạ Đức Tú

Nguồn: http://namtong.org/

*
Gần đây, nhiều diễn đàn PG trên Internet (forums, PalTalk rooms) thường được nhiều người gán ghép những danh xưng như: chùa, chùa ảo, trụ trì, v.v. Có lẽ chúng ta nên tìm hiểu nguồn gốc và ý nghĩa chữ "Chùa" trong tiếng Việt.
*

Về tên gọi Chùa hầu như đều thống nhất từ trước tới nay và ai cũng hiểu rõ đó là một tập hợp kiến trúc nhà làm nơi thờ Phật. Đó là tài sản chung của một cụm người cư trú trên địa bàn nhất định. (Phải chăng cũng vì thế mà trong ngôn ngữ của chúng ta xuất hiện những từ rất “Việt” là… chùa, để chỉ tài sản hay sức lực không của riêng ai cả, muốn tiêu pha thế nào không ai cấm, không ai tiếc, như: của chùa, công chùa, tiền chùa?...).

Bên cạnh cái tên Chùa thuần Việt chất phác ấy thì còn nhiều mỹ từ gốc Hán khác như Tự, Già lam cũng thông dụng không kém để chỉ ngôi chùa trong tiếng Việt.

Dưới đây chúng ta lần lượt tìm hiểu vì sao những từ được dùng để chỉ kiến trúc nhà có chức năng thờ Phật.

Trước hết là Tự (寺): Ngày nay chữ này được dùng đứng sau làm thành tố chính (trung tâm ngữ) để kết hợp với một từ định danh nào đó (định ngữ) tạo thành một cụm danh từ nêu tên gọi một ngôi chùa cụ thể, như Trấn Quốc Tự, Kim Liên tự, Bửu Lâm tự, Vĩnh Nghiêm Tự…

Và như vậy, ai cũng hiểu, Tự nghĩa là chùa. Nhưng trong ngôn ngữ Trung Quốc cổ đại thì nghĩa của Tự không phải là chùa. Vì Phật giáo mới tiến nhập Trung Quốc từ đầu Công Nguyên, trong khi chữ Hán thì đã có sớm hơn rất nhiều.

Tự vốn là từ để chỉ cơ quan làm việc cụ thể của bộ máy chính quyền phong kiến. Sách Hán thư chú: Phàm phủ đình sở tại giai vị chi tự (nói chung nơi làm việc của phủ đình đều gọi là Tự). Khang Hy tự điển chú khá rõ điều này: Hán dĩ Thái thường, Quang lộc, Huân vệ úy, Thái bộc, Đình úy, Đại hồng lô, Tông chính, Tư nông, Thiếu phủ vi cửu khanh. Hậu nguy dĩ lai danh tuy nhưng cửu nhi sở lị chi cục vị chi Tự. Nhân danh Cửu tự (đời Hán lấy Thái thường, Quang lộc, Huân vệ úy, Thái bộc, Đình úy, Đại hồng lô, Tông chính, Tư nông, Thiếu phủ làm Cửu khanh. Nguy trở về sau tuy vẫn để như cũ nhưng các sở cục thì gọi là Tự. Vì vậy mà thành tên Cửu tự [thay cho Cửu Khanh]).

Vậy tại sao từ Tự chỉ một sở cục cụ thể được chuyển hẳn sang nghĩa là chùa? Đây là nguyên nhân lịch sử, đánh dấu mốc đầu tiên trong lịch sử Phật giáo Trung Quốc.

Hán Minh Đế Lưu Trang (25-75) là vị vua đầu tiên thừa nhận địa vị của Phật giáo ở Trung Quốc. Tương truyền nhà vua nằm mộng thấy “người vàng” bay qua sân điện, bèn sai sứ giả 12 người do Lang Trung Thái Âm dẫn đầu sang Tây Trúc cầu tìm đạo Phật. Đó là sự kiện năm Vĩnh Bình 7 (64).

Ba năm sau (67), sứ giả về với hai tăng nhân người Ấn Độ cùng rất nhiều kinh sách và tượng Phật được thồ trên lưng ngựa trắng.

Lúc các tăng nhân cùng kinh, tượng, về đến kinh đô, triều đình chưa chuẩn bị kịp chỗ ở riêng nên cho ở tạm trong Hồng lô tự (một cơ quan trong Cửu khanh).

Sau đó nhà vua mới cho xây dựng cái mà chúng ta gọi là chùa để thờ Phật và các tăng nhân tu tập. Kiến trúc xây dựng theo kiểu mẫu dinh thự của quý tộc đương thời.

Sau đó chùa được xây dựng ngày càng nhiều cũng theo kiểu mẫu nhà ở của địa phương. Chính vì vậy mà chùa ở Trung Quốc, và cả ở Việt Nam khi tiếp nhận Phật giáo theo hướng Trung Quốc, có kiểu chùa rất riêng, không theo quy chuẩn mái cong tháp nhọn như nơi Phật giáo phát nguyên.

Nhân vì kinh và tượng Phật được thồ về trên lưng ngựa trắng nên đặt tên chùa là Bạch Mã. Tự là chỗ đầu tiên tăng nhân tạm trú khi đến Trung Quốc nên được chuyển sang làm thành tố chính để gọi tên cho ngôi chùa: Bạch Mã Tự, ngôi chùa phật giáo đầu tiên của Trung Quốc.

Già lam 伽 藍: cũng là tên gọi của ngôi chùa. Đây không phải là tên có nguồn gốc biến đổi như Tự trên kia.

Già lam là tên gọi tắt của Tăng già lam ma (Sangharama). Tăng già là một nhóm tăng nhân đi Hoằng pháp, thường từ bốn người trở lên. Tăng già lam ma 僧伽藍: là nơi ở của các tăng nhân để tu hành, sau chỉ chung kiến trúc ngôi chùa.

Như vậy, già lam ở đây nghĩa như Tự. Nhưng theo tài liệu bằng chữ Hán của Tuần phủ Hà Nam-hiệp biện đại học sĩ Mai Viên Đoàn Triển (1854- 1919) trong An Nam phong tục sách thì Già lam chỉ là chùa nhỏ. Nguyên văn như sau: Tự dĩ Phụng phật, xã dân giai hữu chi (…). Hữu chung lâu, hữu cổ lâu, quy chế đa hữu hậu viện vi Tăng ni trụ trì sở. Sóc vọng hiến cung niệm Phật tụng kinh. Diệc hữu Tiểu tự, vô Tăng ni, hữu Thủ tự nhất nhân, hương hoa đăng cung lễ, vị chi già lam. (Chùa để thờ Phật, xã dân nào cũng có). Có lầu chuông, có lầu trống, quy chế (thờ tự, cúng tế) nhiều hơn đình, miếu; có tăng ni và tháp mộ, có hậu viện làm nơi ở cho trụ trì và Tăng ni. Ngày rằm mùng một cúng cúng hoa quả và niệm Phật tụng kinh.

Cũng có chùa nhỏ (tiểu tự), không có tăng ni có một người giữ chùa (Thủ tự, ông Tự) để dâng hương, thắp đèn lễ cúng, gọi là Già lam). Theo ý kiến của ông Đoàn Triển ở sách trên thì Già lam chỉ là ngôi chùa nhỏ, không có quy mô tổ chức và kiến trúc như chùa. Nhưng theo các tài liệu Phật giáo cũng có những ngôi chùa cụ thể được gọi là Già lam, như ngôi Già lam- Cổ tự ở Phụng Hiệp (Hậu Giang) thì quy mô tổ chức cũng như quần thể kiến trúc không nhỏ chút nào, nếu không muốn nói là có phần diễm lệ.

Thế nào gọi là Chùa? Vì sao nó chỉ kiến trúc ngôi nhà thờ Phật?

Điều chắc hẳn ai cũng thừa nhận chùa là tên gọi thuần của người Việt. Để tìm hiểu nghĩa của chữ Chùa chúng ta cần tìm hiểu chức năng của ngôi chùa. Chùa là nơi thờ Phật, chốn linh thiêng, thanh tịnh, là nơi mỗi tháng hai lần các Phật tử dâng hương hoa trà quả để lễ Phật.

Lễ vật cúng Chùa thường là những hằng sản địa phương, được đem lên tế lễ rồi chẩn phát, cứu tế luôn cho những người nghèo khó. Như vậy ý nghĩa nhân văn của ngôi chùa truyền thống rất lớn: là nơi để người giàu san sẻ, người khó tựa nương.

Đây cũng là một trong những tôn chỉ quan trọng mà nhà chùa hiện nay đang thực hiện.

Truy về nguồn gốc chữ Chùa không đâu hơn là dựa vào mã chữ Nôm. Trong chữ Nôm, Chùa được ghi bằng Trù. Ngữ âm lịch sử đã chứng minh: /ch/ là âm trước của /tr/ khi người Việt đọc chữ Hán.

Chùa là âm tiền Hán Việt của Trù, nó nằm trong hệ thống ch > tr, như chén > trản, chém > trảm, chọn > trạch, chèo > trạo, chầy > trì, chay > trai, chứa > trữ... Trù có nghĩa là bếp, tiếng Hán hiện đại, trù phòng có nghĩa là nhà bếp, nơi ấm áp, yên bình trong mỗi gia đình.

Suy rộng ra xã hội, nơi ấm áp, yên bình nhất chính là ngôi chùa. Chùa là nơi người ta được san sẻ, được thỏa nguyện về cả vật chất lẫn tinh thần. Ý nghĩa từ ngữ thật cao đẹp biết bao!

Trong tiếng việt ta còn có chữ chùa chiền để chỉ chung về những thắng cảnh Phật giáo. Vậy Chiền là gì? Nó là từ có yếu tố độc lập hay là yếu tố láy của từ chùa? Thực ra nó xuất phát từ âm Triền: chỗ ở của người dân nói chung. Cũng như chùa, Chiền là âm tiếng Hán Việt của Triền Hán Việt.

Như vậy đây là một từ ghép đẳng lập của người Việt để chỉ thắng cảnh Phật giáo nói chung. Trong đó, Chùa là yếu tố trung tâm tương đương với nó chính là Tự. Còn tiếng Hán tương đương với chùa chiền không phải là Tự mà là Sát. Sát là âm được phiên âm từ tiếng Phạn, là chùa nói chung, từ Hán Việt có các từ như: Cổ sát: chùa cổ, Bảo sát danh sơn: thắng cảnh núi non có chùa…

Qua đây có thể thấy cha ông chúng ta đã biết tiếng Việt hóa cao độ các thuật ngữ Phật giáo để làm giàu cho tiếng Việt. Tuy là vay mượn nhưng dấu vết hầu như mất hẳn vì nó thấm nhuần tư duy nhân văn của người Việt.

Bên cạnh một số tên gọi đã ăn sâu vào ngôn ngữ Việt khi chỉ về ngôi chùa như trên, thì cũng còn nhiều từ khác dùng phổ biến ở Trung Quốc mà khi nhắc tới ta đều biết nó chỉ ngôi chùa, như: Phật sát, Phật điện, Phật đường, Phật khám, Phật sát, Phật tự, Tăng phòng, Tăng viện, Tăng xá, Thiền già, Thiền trai, Thiền xá, Tự môn, Tự quán, Tự viện… Đó là do quá trình tiếp xúc lâu dài,thường xuyên với tiếng Hán. Tất cả các từ trên đều có thể dịch là Chùa. Trong các từ trên, yếu tố đầu: Phật, Tăng, Thiền là thuật ngữ Phật giáo; Tự là chùa đã nói ở trên. Yếu tố sau là những kiến trúc nhà khác nhau trong tiếng Hán. Nó góp phần định danh tường minh hơn cho ngôi chùa cụ thể.

Tổng quan lại có thể thấy nghĩa của các từ chùa chỉ về ngôi chùa luôn gắn bó mật thiết với ngôi nhà của chúng ta. Chính vì vậy mà tư tên gọi đã toát lên vẻ ấm áp, thân thương và gần gũi, mang đậm tư duy Phật giáo Á Đông.

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Nguyễn Ngọc San - Lý thuyết chữ Nôm - NXB ĐHSP Hà Nội, 2006

2. Đoàn Triển – An Nam phong tục sách (tư liệu Hán Nôm).

*

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Which opinion?

collected from the Internet:

..."We have an old family saying: "you value the opinions that agree with your own". Most of us tend to go opinion shopping, or forecast browsing, until we find opinions and forecasts that suit our temperaments or prejudices and declare them wise.

A wiser course would be to value opinions that disagree with your own, to challenge your own beliefs, but it's not nearly as comfortable for us fundamentally sociable animals – the comfort of being part of the herd."

*

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

Enlightenments

Jack Kornfield
The Inquiring Mind,
http://www.inquiringmind.com/Articles/Enlightenments.html


Jack Kornfield trained as a Buddhist monk in the monasteries of Thailand, India and Burma. He has taught meditation internationally since 1974 and is a founding teacher of the Insight Meditation Society and Spirit Rock Meditation Center. He is author of many books, including the new title The Buddha Is Still Teaching.

* * *

On a meditation retreat several years ago, late one evening after the Dharma talk, a woman raised her hand and asked one last question: “Is enlightenment just a myth?” When we teachers went back to our evening meeting, we asked each other this question. We exchanged stories about the creative freedom of Ajahn Chah, the enormous field of metta around Dipa Ma, the joyous laughter of Poonja, and of our own awakenings. Of course there is enlightenment.

But the word enlightenment is used in different ways, and that can be confusing. Is Zen, Tibetan, Hindu or Theravada enlightenment the same? What is the difference between an enlightenment experience and full enlightenment? What do enlightened people look like?

APPROACHES TO ENLIGHTENMENT

Early on in my practice in Asia, I was forced to deal with these questions quite directly. My teachers, Ajahn Chah in Thailand and Mahasi Sayadaw in Burma, were both considered among the most enlightened masters of Theravada Buddhism. While they both described the goal of practice as free-dom from greed, hatred and delusion, they didn’t agree about how to attain enlightenment, nor how it is experienced. I started my monastic training practicing in community with Ajahn Chah. Then I went to study in a monastery of Mahasi Sayadaw, where the path of liberation focuses entirely on long silent meditation retreats.

In the Mahasi system, you sit and walk for weeks in the retreat context and continuously note the arising of breath, thought, feelings and sensations over and over until the mindfulness is so refined there is nothing but instantaneous arising and passing. You pass through stages of luminosity, joy, fear and the dissolution of all you took to be solid. The mind becomes unmoving, resting in a place of stillness and equanimity, transparent to all experience, thoughts and fears, longings and love. Out of this there comes a dropping away of identity with anything in this world, an opening to the unconditioned beyond mind and body; you enter into the stream of liberation. As taught by Mahasi Sayadaw, this first taste of stream-entry to enlightenment requires purification and strong concentration leading to an experience of cessation that begins to uproot greed, hatred and delusion.

When I returned to practice in Ajahn Chah’s community following more than a year of silent Mahasi retreat, I recounted all of these experiences—dissolving my body into light, profound insights into emptiness, hours of vast stillness and freedom. Ajahn Chah understood and appreciated them from his own deep wisdom. Then he smiled and said, “Well, something else to let go of.” His approach to enlightenment was not based on having any particular meditation experience, no matter how profound. As Ajahn Chah described them, meditative states are not important in themselves. Meditation is a way to quiet the mind so you can practice all day long wherever you are; see when there is grasping or aversion, clinging or suffering; and then let it go. What’s left is enlightenment, always found here and now, a release of identification with the changing conditions of the world, a resting in awareness. This involves a simple yet profound shift of identity from the myriad, ever-changing conditioned states to the unconditioned consciousness—the awareness which knows them all. In Ajahn Chah’s approach, release from entanglement in greed, hatred and delusion does not happen through retreat, concentration and cessation but from this profound shift in identity.

How can we understand these seemingly different approaches to enlightenment? The Buddhist texts contain some of the same contrasting descriptions. In many texts, nirvana is described in the language of negation, and as in the approach taught by Mahasi Sayadaw, enlightenment is presented as the end of suffering through the putting out of the fires of craving, the uprooting of all forms of clinging. The elimination of suffering is practiced by purification and concentration, by confronting the forces of greed and hate and overcoming them. When the Buddha was asked, “Do you teach annihilation? Is nirvana the end of things as we know them?” he responded, “I teach only one form of annihilation: the extinction of greed, the extinction of hatred, the extinction of delusion. This I call nirvana.”

There is in the texts, as well, a more positive way of understanding enlightenment. Here nirvana is described as the highest happiness; as peace, freedom, purity, stillness; and as the unconditioned, the timeless, the undying. In this understanding, as in Ajahn Chah’s approach, liberation comes through a shift of identity—a release from attachment to the changing conditions of the world, a resting in consciousness itself, the deathless.

In this understanding, liberation is a shift of identity from taking anything as “self.” Asked, “How is it that one is not to be seen by the king of death?” the Buddha responded, “For one who takes nothing whatsoever as I or me or mine, such a one is freed from the snares of the king of death.” In just this way, Ajahn Chah instructed us to rest in awareness and not identify with any experience as I or mine.

I found a similar practice in Bombay with Sri Nisargadatta, a master of Advaita. His teachings about enlightenment demanded a shift from identifying with any experience to resting in consciousness wherever you are. His focus was not about annihilation of greed and hate. In fact, when asked if he ever got impatient, Nisargadatta joyfully explained, “I see, hear and taste as you do, feel hunger and thirst; if lunch is not served on time, even impatience will arise. All this I perceive quite clearly, but somehow I am not in it. There is awareness of it all and a sense of immense distance. Impatience arises; hunger arises. Even when illness and death of this body arise, they have nothing to do with who I am.” This is enlightenment as a shift in identity.

So here we have different visions of enlightenment. On the one hand, we have the liberation from greed, hatred and delusion attained through powerful concentration and purification, emphasized by many masters from Mahasi and Sunlun Sayadaw to Rinzai Zen. On the other hand, we have the shift of identity reflected in the teachings of Ajahn Chah, Buddhadasa, Soto Zen and Dzogchen. And there are many other approaches; if you practice Pure Land Buddhism, which is the most widespread tradition in China, the approach to enlightenment involves devotion and surrender, being carried by the Buddha’s “grace.”

To understand these differences, it is wisest to speak of enlightenment with the plural s—as enlightenments. It’s the same way with God. There are so many forms: Jehovah, Allah, Brahma, Jesus, Kali and so forth. As soon as followers say they know the one true God, conflict arises. Similarly, if you speak of enlightenment as one thing, conflict arises and you miss the truth.

We know that the Buddha taught many different approaches to enlightenment, all as skillful means to release grasping of the limited sense of self and return to the inherent purity of consciousness. Similarly, we will discover that the teachings on enlightened consciousness include many dimensions. When you actually experience consciousness free of identification with changing conditions, liberated from greed and hate, you find it multifaceted, like a mandala or a jewel, a crystal with many sides. Through one facet, the enlightened heart shines as luminous clarity, through another as perfect peace, through another as boundless compassion. Consciousness is timeless, ever-present, completely empty and full of all things. But when a teacher or tradition emphasizes only one of these qualities over the others, it is easy to be confused, as if true enlightenment can be tasted in only one way. Like the particle-and-wave nature of light, enlightenment consciousness is experienced in a myriad of beautiful ways.

GATEWAYS TO ENLIGHTENMENT

So what practices lead to these enlightenments? Most centrally, Buddhism uses the liberating practices of mindfulness and lovingkindness. These are supported by the practice of virtue, which frees us from being caught in reactive energies that would cause harm to ourself or others. Added to this are practices of composure, or concentration, where we learn to quiet the mind; and practices of wisdom, which can see clearly how all things arise and pass, how they cannot be possessed. Through these practices come purification and healing and the arising of profound compassion. Gradually, there is a shift of identity from being the person who is caught in suffering, to liberation. Releasing the sense of self and all the changing conditions of the world brings stream-entry, the first stage of enlightenment.

The most common gates to stream-entry in the Theravada tradition are the gateway of impermanence, the gateway of suffering and the gateway of selflessness. When we open through the gateway of impermanence, we see more and more deeply how every experience is born and dies, how every moment is new. In one monastery where I practiced, we were trained to experience how all of life is vibration. Through long hours of refined concentration, we came to sense all the sounds and sights, the breath, the procession of thoughts—everything we took to be ourself—as a field of changing energy. Experience shimmered, dissolving moment by moment. Then we shifted our attention from the vibrations to restin the spacious heart of awareness. I and other, inside and outside—everything dropped away and we came to know the vast stillness beyond all change. This is enlightenment through the gate of impermanence.

Sometimes we enter enlightenment through the gate of suffering. We sit in the fire of human experience, and instead of running from it, we awaken through it. In the Fire Sermon, the Buddha declares, “All is burning. The eye, the nose, the tongue, the body, the mind, the world is burning. With what is it burning? It is burning with the fires of greed, of hatred and of delusion.” Through the gate of suffering we face the fires of desire, hate, war, racism and fear. We open to dissatisfaction, grief and loss. We accept the inherent suffering in life and we are released. We discover that suffering is not “our” pain, it is “the” pain—the pain of the world. A profound dispassion arises, compassion fills the heart, and we find liberation.

My friend Salam, a Palestinian journalist and activist, passed through the gate of suffering when brutally beaten in Israeli prisons. This kind of suffering happens on every side in war. When I first met Salam in San Francisco, he was being honored for his hospice service. I asked him what brought him to this work. “One time I died,” Salam told me. Kicked by a guard, he lay on the floor of the jail with blood coming out of his mouth, and his consciousness floated out of his body. Suddenly, he felt so peaceful—a kind of bliss—as he saw he wasn’t that body. “I was so much more: I was the boot and the guard, the goat calling outside the walls of the police station. I was all of it,” Salam told me. “When I got out of jail, I couldn’t take sides anymore. I married a Jewish woman and had Jewish-Palestinian children. That is my answer.” Salam explains, “Now I sit with people who are dying because they are afraid and I can hold their hands and reassure them that it’s perfectly safe.” He awakened through the gate of suffering.

Sometimes we awaken through the gate of selflessness. The experience of selflessness can happen in the simplest ways. In walking meditation, we notice with every step the unbidden arising of thoughts, feelings, sensations, only to observe them disappear. To whom do they belong? Where do they go? Back into the void, which is where yesterday went, as well as our childhood, Socrates, Genghis Khan and the builders of the pyramids.

As we let go of clinging, we feel the tentative selflessness of things. Sometimes boundaries dissolve, and we can’t separate ourself from the plum tree, the birdsong or the morning traffic. The whole sense of self becomes empty experience arising in consciousness. More and more deeply, we realize the joy of “no self, no problem.” We taste enlightenment through the gate of selflessness and emptiness.

There are many other gates: the gates of compassion, of purity, of surrender, of love. There is also what is called the “gateless gate.” One teacher describes it this way: “I would go for months of retreat training, and nothing spectacular would happen, no great experiences. Yet somehow everything changed. What most transformed me were the endless hours of mindfulness and compassion, giving a caring attention to what I was doing. I discovered how I automatically tighten and grasp, and with that realization I started to let go, to open to an appreciation of whatever was present. I found an ease. I gave up striving. I became less serious, less concerned with myself. My kindness deepened. I experienced a profound freedom, simply the fruit of being present over and over.” This was her gateless gate.

EXPRESSIONS OF ENLIGHTENMENT

Whatever our gate to enlightenment, the first real taste, stream-entry, is followed by many more tastes as we learn to stabilize, deepen and embody this wisdom in our own unique life. What does it look like? The facets of enlightenment express themselves marvelously in our teachers. Each manifests enlightenment with his or her own flavors.

Dipa Ma, a wonderful grandmother in Calcutta, was one of the great masters of our tradition. A tiny person with a powerfully trained mind, Dipa Ma expressed enlightenment as love. She devotedly instructed her students in mindfulness and lovingkindness and then she hugged them—putting her hands on their head, face and shoulders, whispering metta phrases. They got drunk on love. Like Dipa Ma, Ammachi, a Hindu teacher from South India, manifests enlightenment as the “hugging guru.” She goes into a trance, and all night long she holds people; she might take as many as 2,000 people onto her lap and hug them. This is enlightenment as love.

For Zen Master Suzuki Roshi enlightenment was expressed by being just where you are. A woman told Suzuki Roshi she found it difficult to mix Zen practice with the demands of being a householder: “I feel I am trying to climb a ladder, but for every step upward I slip backward two steps.” “Forget the ladder,” Suzuki Roshi told her. “When you awaken, everything is right here on the ground.” He explained how the desire to gain anything means you miss the reality of the present. “When you realize the truth that everything changes and find your composure in it, there you find yourself in nirvana.” Asked further about enlightenment, Suzuki Roshi said, “Strictly speaking there are no enlightened beings; there is only enlightened activity.” If you think you are enlightened, that is not it. The goal is to let go of being anyone special and meet each moment with beginner’s mind.

Mahasi Sayadaw, the Burmese master, expressed enlightenment as emptiness. Watching him on his visits to America, we saw that he rarely laughed or judged. Instead, he exuded a quiet equanimity. Events and conversations would happen around him while he remained still. He was like space—transparent, nobody there. This is enlightenment as emptiness.

For Ajahn Jumnien, a Thai forest master, awakening is not only empty; it’s full. His robe is covered in hundreds of sacred medallions, and he employs dozens of skillful means to teach—guided meditations, sacred chants, mantras, chakra and energy practices, forest medicines, animal stories and shamanic rituals. His Dharma is all-hours, nonstop, full of life and joy. There’s a sense of abundance in him, and happiness just pours out like a fountain. He expresses enlightenment as fullness.

Thich Nhat Hanh expresses enlightenment as mindfulness. When he comes to teach at Spirit Rock, 3,000 people sit meditatively on the hillside and eat their apples mindfully in preparation for his arrival. A bell is rung, and he walks slowly and deliberately up the road—so mindfully that everyone sighs, “Ahhh.” The consciousness of 3,000 people is transformed just seeing this man walk, each step the whole universe. As we watch, we drop into the reality of the eternal present. This is where we awaken. Enlightenment as mindfulness.

The Dalai Lama expresses enlightenment as compassionate blessing. For instance, once at the end of his stay at a San Francisco hotel, he asked the management to bring out all the employees. This meant the people who chop vegetables in the kitchen, who clean the carpets late at night, who make the beds. The big circular driveway filled with all those who made this hotel work but who were usually unrecognized. One by one, he looked at each one with full presence, took each person’s hand, and said, “Thank you,” moving unhurriedly just to make sure that he connected with each one fully. The Dalai Lama personifies enlightenment as compassionate blessing.

Ajahn Chah’s manifestation was the laughter of wisdom. Whether with generals or ministers, farmers or cooks, he would say, “When I see how much people are struggling, I look at them with great sympathy and ask, ‘Are you suffering? Ahhh, you must be very attached. Why not let go?’” His teachings were deep and straight to the point. He’d say, “If you let go a little, you’ll be a little happy. If you let go a lot, you’ll be a lot happy. If you let go completely, you’ll be completely happy.” He saw suffering, its cause, and that freedom is possible in any moment. He expressed enlightenment as wisdom.

When people read these stories, they might ask, “How do they relate to me? I want these enlightenments. How do I get them? What should I do?” The jewel of enlightenment invites us to awaken through many skillful means. Mahasi Sayadaw would say, “To find emptiness, note every single moment until what you think to be the world dissolves, and you will come to know freedom.” Ajahn Chah would say, “Just let go, and become the awareness, be the one who knows.” Dipa Ma would say, “Love no matter what.” Thich Nhat Hanh would say, “Rest in mindfulness, this moment, the eternal present.” Ajahn Jumnien would say, “Be happy for no cause.” Suzuki Roshi would say, “Just be exactly where you are. Instead of waiting for the bus, realize you are on the bus.”

So, is enlightenment a myth? No. It is not far away. It is freedom here and now, to be tasted whenever you open to it. In my role as a teacher, I have the privilege of seeing the blessing of enlightenments awaken in so many meditators who come to Dharma practice and become transformed through its many expressions. As their initial tension and struggle with life, doubt and distress subsides, I watch their bodies ease, their faces soften, their Dharma vision open, their hearts blossom. Some touch what Buddhadasa called “everyday nirvana.” Others come to know a deep purity of mind and to experience a taste of liberation directly.

The Buddha declares, “If it were not possible to free the heart from entanglement, I would not teach you to do so. Just because it is possible to free the heart, there arise the teachings of the Dharma of liberation, offered openhandedly for the welfare of all beings.”

Aim for nothing less.

*

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

Equanimity (Tâm Xả)

*
Excerpts from Nyanaponika Thera's The Four Sublime States:

*
Love [i.e. metta, tâm Từ] imparts to equanimity its selflessness, its boundless nature and even its fervor. For fervor, too, transformed and controlled, is part of perfect equanimity, strengthening its power of keen penetration and wise restraint.
 ...

Compassion [tâm Bi] guards equanimity from falling into a cold indifference, and keeps it from indolent or selfish isolation. Until equanimity has reached perfection, compassion urges it to enter again and again the battle of the world, in order to be able to stand the test, by hardening and strengthening itself.

...

Sympathetic joy [tâm Hỷ] gives to equanimity the mild serenity that softens its stern appearance. It is the divine smile on the face of the Enlightened One, a smile that persists in spite of his deep knowledge of the world's suffering, a smile that gives solace and hope, fearlessness and confidence: "Wide open are the doors to deliverance," thus it speaks.

Equanimity [tâm Xả] rooted in insight is the guiding and restraining power for the other three sublime states. It points out to them the direction they have to take, and sees to it that this direction is followed. Equanimity guards love and compassion from being dissipated in vain quests and from going astray in the labyrinths of uncontrolled emotion. Equanimity, being a vigilant self-control for the sake of the final goal, does not allow sympathetic joy to rest content with humble results, forgetting the real aims we have to strive for.

Equanimity, which means "even-mindedness," gives to love an even, unchanging firmness and loyalty. It endows it with the great virtue of patience. Equanimity furnishes compassion with an even, unwavering courage and fearlessness, enabling it to face the awesome abyss of misery and despair which confront boundless compassion again and again. To the active side of compassion, equanimity is the calm and firm hand led by wisdom — indispensable to those who want to practice the difficult art of helping others. And here again equanimity means patience, the patient devotion to the work of compassion.

In these and other ways equanimity may be said to be the crown and culmination of the other three sublime states. The first three, if unconnected with equanimity and insight, may dwindle away due to the lack of a stabilizing factor. Isolated virtues, if unsupported by other qualities which give them either the needed firmness or pliancy, often deteriorate into their own characteristic defects. For instance, loving-kindness, without energy and insight, may easily decline to a mere sentimental goodness of weak and unreliable nature.

Moreover, such isolated virtues may often carry us in a direction contrary to our original aims and contrary to the welfare of others, too. It is the firm and balanced character of a person that knits isolated virtues into an organic and harmonious whole, within which the single qualities exhibit their best manifestations and avoid the pitfalls of their respective weaknesses. And this is the very function of equanimity, the way it contributes to an ideal relationship between all four sublime states.

Equanimity is a perfect, unshakable balance of mind, rooted in insight. But in its perfection and unshakable nature equanimity is not dull, heartless and frigid. Its perfection is not due to an emotional "emptiness," but to a "fullness" of understanding, to its being complete in itself. Its unshakable nature is not the immovability of a dead, cold stone, but the manifestation of the highest strength.
 
* * *

Monday, 3 January 2011

Meditation by Hollywood's Stars

*
Stars' meditation technique gains mental health experts' approval
William Skidelsky

Source: The Guardian,
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jan/02/mindfulness-meditation-meg-ryan-goldie-hawn

*
A form of meditation practised by some of Hollywood's biggest stars is becoming a major growth area within British psychology, as evidence grows of its effectiveness in dealing with anxiety and depression.

"Mindfulness meditation" was pioneered in the United States during the 1970s as a tool for alleviating stress and is practised, among others, by Meg Ryan and Goldie Hawn, who acts as an advocate for the technique. Drawing on ancient Buddhist principles to combat mental suffering, the technique encourages practitioners to slow down, "inhabit the moment" and become more accepting of their feelings. According to Ryan, "by simply refocusing our awareness, we reshape our experience".

Although initially regarded with scepticism by mainstream psychologists, the practice has gained respectability thanks to research indicating its clinical effectiveness. A new study in the American journal Archives of General Psychiatry found that the mindfulness technique was as effective as the use of anti-depressants among a controlled group in remission from major depression.

A study by researchers in Wales, Toronto and Cambridge found that in cases of recurring depression it reduced the risk of relapse by 50%. As a result, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice) adopted it in its guidelines as a recommended intervention in cases of chronic depression. Recent studies have shown that the technique can have other significant benefits, including boosting the immune system and encouraging left-field brain activity – the side most associated with feelings of wellbeing.

The impressive experimental results have led to a surge in interest and increasing demand that the practice be made more widely available. Research centres have sprung up across the country and there has been an explosion of mindfulness courses in non-clinical settings.

The School of Life in central London offers a variety of classes applying mindfulness techniques, including "How to Face Death" and "How to Stay Calm". The Mental Health Foundation has launched Be Mindful, a campaign geared to making the technique available to "everyone who wants it", while the Mindfulness in Schools campaign has been established to encourage its adoption in classrooms.

Ed Halliwell, a teacher on mindfulness and co-author of a recent book, The Mindfulness Manifesto, attributed the popularity to the technique's blending of age-old spirituality with modern convenience: "It's based on thousands of years of wisdom. It is simple but not always easy to do. You don't need any special equipment. It's not expensive. And it seems to connect with a lot of people's intuitive sense that slowing down, practising stillness, learning how to be with our body and mind are good things. These are ancient ways of working to develop wellbeing, but what's happened now is that the science is catching up and showing us that this does actually work. It's become very of the moment."

However, some psychologists are cautious about overselling the benefits or applying mindfulness too zealously outside a clinical setting. Florian Ruths, who runs a mindfulness meditation programme at the Maudsley Hospital in south London, argues that the technique's very success in becoming part of the psychological mainstream could lead people to view it as a quick-fix solution.

"I think we need to be cautious," he said. "At the moment the enthusiasm is much higher than the evidence. Those who practise mindfulness meditation know it makes a huge difference to people's lives. But there is a danger of saying it works in psychology so why not use it for almost anything in life? And suddenly having a bit of pleasure, or seeing something beautiful, becomes an act of mindfulness.

"We need to be careful that we don't create an impression that we've got something proven to be effective for almost everything when we haven't actually done the scientific work."

According to Ruths, when practised properly in a clinical setting, mindfulness meditation has three key benefits. First, "it teaches us to immerse ourselves deeper in the present rather than worry about things we can't control in the future – will I have a job? Will I be OK in five years' time? – or dwell on something in the past that we can't change either."

Second, it "teaches us something about the validity of thoughts and emotions. When we are in a difficult state we believe several things: it will never end, it says something about us being flawed, and we need to get out of it now. Mindfulness helps us to see that emotions change and that if I have a thought, it is not necessarily the reality, it is just a thought."

Third, he says, "mindfulness itself is an act of kindness, of compassion. It teaches us about directing the capacity for compassion that we all have at ourselves. That in itself is something new."

One 37-year-old woman who attended a group course at the Maudsley last summer said she was encouraged to try the technique after more than 20 years of suffering acute depression, anxiety and fatigue, and more recently panic attacks. After experiencing the "recurrent corruptions of medication", she was not hopeful that this technique would be any different. "I expected it to be merely another variation on the theme of cognitive hygiene. But I was wrong. There was no feeling of ideological imposition or the energetic tidying of my psyche. It felt respectful, gentle, patient, almost companionable."

With time and regular practice, the techniques she learned started to make a difference. Her panic attacks ceased and she was able to cope without medication for the first time in more than two decades. One of the technique's benefits, she said, is the ease with which she had been able to incorporate it within her busy life. "Since doing the course, I have tried to continue regularly with the various meditation practices I learned. It has made waiting, even on rowdy buses, a prized opportunity, for such practices do not rely on a quiet without, but a quiet within."

*